Tidemann Websøk
Loading…
Portal
Søk
Min konto
Logg på
Avansert søk
Enkelt søk
Kun fritekst
Kommandosøk
Marcdata
RIS
Referanse
Tittel:
COVID-19 Tracing Apps as a Legal Problem: An Investigation of the Norwegian ‘Smittestopp’ App
Ansvar:
Mona Naomi Lintvedt
Forfatter:
Lintvedt, Mona Naomi
Materialtype:
Artikkel - elektronisk
Signatur:
Oslo law review
Utgitt:
Oslo : Universitetsforlaget, 2021
Omfang:
S. 69 - 87
Serie:
Oslo law review
; 2/2021
Emneord:
GDPR
/
Korona - COVID-19
/
Pandemi
/
Personvern
/
Vitenskapelig publikasjon
Stikkord:
Direktiv 2000/31/EF - Netthandeldirektivet – E-handeldirektivet
/
EMK - Artikkel 8 - Konvensjon om beskyttelse av menneskerettighetene og de grunnleggende friheter
/
Forordning (EU) 2016/679 - Artikkel 5 - Personvernforordningen (GDPR)
/
Forordning (EU) 2016/679 - Artikkel 6 - Personvernforordningen (GDPR)
/
Forordning (EU) 2016/679 - Artikkel 9 - Personvernforordningen (GDPR)
Note:
Open access, Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Innhold:
Abstract
In their efforts to curb the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries have introduced contact tracing apps installed on mobile phones with the aim of breaking chains of infection. This raises ethical and legal questions, as these apps have the potential to be used for surveillance of the population. There is pressure to set privacy and data protection aside to allow extensive collection and processing of personal data, while the benefits of the apps remain uncertain. The two versions of the Norwegian COVID-19 tracing app are used as a case study to explore how law and legal norms are made and implemented—or not—in the context of a public emergency. In Norway, the legal question of contact tracing apps has largely been limited to a question of compliance with the GDPR and has excluded a meaningful conversation about the use of apps as pandemic response tools and their impact on rights and freedoms. The normative argument of the article is that to combine a robust form of privacy and data protection with the use of digital tools in a crisis, we need to scrutinize carefully the effects technology choices have on human rights and the rule of law.
Tracing apps: Smittestopp 1 and Smittestopp 2
Keywords: COVID-19 contact tracing app GDPR location data Smittestopp privacy
Del av verk:
Oslo law review 2/2021
Lintvedt, Mona Naomi
Oslo law review
Limits to party autonomy in international commercial arbitration
; 1/2014
Enforcement of security rights in residential immovable property and consumer protection
; 1/2014
Legally flawed but politically sound? Digital exhaustion of copyright in Europe after usedsoft
; 1/2014
The European Court of Justice and general principles derived from the acquis communautaire
; 1/2014
Detention for protection
; 1/2015
Why judicial review?
; 1/2015
The battle for rights – getting data protection cases to court
; 1/2015
Harmonising human rights law and private international law through the ordre public reservation
; 1/2016
The place of human dignity in environmental adjudication
; 1/2016
The consumer’s right of withdrawal in case of payment with bitcoins
; 1/2016
Bringing law into the political sociology of humanitarianism
; 1/2017
Expert knowledge as a condition of the rhetorical situation in criminal cases
; 1/2017
Intelligible data protection legislation
; 1/2017
Constitutions as pathways to gender equality in plural legal contexts
; 1/2018
The (dis)ability of child rights?
; 1/2018
Public rplicy as a ground for refusal to enforce EU antitrust damages awards
; 1/2018
Rationale of the Exclusion of Choice of Law by the Parties in Articles 6(4) and 8(3) of Rome II Regulation
; 1/2019
Choice of Law for Insurance Contracts: History of Article 7 of Rome I, Particularly Regarding the Relationship with Directives 88/357 and 90/619 in Light of Directive 2009/138
; 1/2019
Towards a Norwegian codification of choice-of-Law rules
; 1/2019
Choice of Law and Intellectual Property Rights
; 1/2019
Autonomous Interpretation of ‘Civil and Commercial Matters’: Do Public Authorities’ Claims for Clean-up Costs for Pure Environmental Harm Qualify?
; 1/2019
Contracts of Carriage and International Conventions
; 1/2019
Choice of Law by the Parties in Rome II: Rationale of the Differentiation between Consumer and Commercial Contracts
; 1/2019
The Relationship between the Rome II Regulation and the 1973 Hague Convention
; 1/2019
Assignment of Claims and Proprietary Effects: Overview of Doctrinal Debate and the EU Commission’s Proposal
; 1/2019
Choice of Law for Defamation, Privacy Rights and Freedom of Speech
; 1/2019
Human Rights and Private International Law in the Family Law Area
; 1/2020
Expanding the Framework of Family Issues: Bringing Children’s Rights and Children’s Perspectives into Immigration
; 1/2020
‘Listening to the Winds’ of Europeanisation?
; 1/2020
Finnish Children or ‘Cubs of the Caliphate’?
; 1/2020
Politics on Trial? Criminal Justice and Egyptʼs Political Opposition in the Aftermath of July 2013
; 1/2021
The EFTA Court and International Law
; 1/2021
Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act?
; 1/2021
Can or should schools in Norway exclude student teachers from the Christian university college NLA to protect the rights of sexual minorities?
; 1/2022
The reach of jobseeker rights to free movement: On the complementary relationship between primary and secondary law
; 1/2022
Oslo law review 1/2022
; 1/2022
Jus Contra Bellum in Cyberspace and the Sound of Silence
; 1/2022
Oslo law review 1/2023
; 1/2023
The European Union Should Not Ignore the Female Face of Forced Labour
; 1/2023
Doctor Chatbot: The EUʼs Regulatory Prescription for Generative Medical AI
; 1/2023
Government Access to Personal Data and Transnational Interoperability: An Accountability Perspective
; 1/2023
How is ʻUnexplainable’ and Non-transparent AI Affecting Healthcare Delivery?
; 1/2024
Oslo law review 1/2024
; 1/2024
Introduction
; 1/2024
AI Robotics in Healthcare Between the EU Medical Device Regulation and the Artificial Intelligence Act
; 1/2024
AI Systems and Criminal Liability
; 1/2024
The Consequences of the AI Act and Proposed AI Liability Directive on Medical Negligence
; 1/2024
Smart Robotics in the EU Legal Framework
; 1/2024
The crime against humanity of apartheid in a post-apartheid world
; 2/2015
Competition law through an ordoliberal lens
; 2/2015
Limitless borderless forgetfulness? Limiting the geographical reach of the ‘Right to be Forgotten’
; 2/2015
History, memory and the problem of ‘bad laws’
; 2/2016
Is e-justice reform of Norwegian civil procedure finally happening?
; 2/2016
Inscribing Islamic shari‘a in Egyptian divorce law
; 2/2016
The Swedish sex purchase act: where does it stand?
; 2/2017
Data protection by design and by default
; 2/2017
The use of court- and party-appointed experts in legal proceedings in Sweden
; 2/2017
Autonomous weapons systems and the rights of victims
; 2/2018
The concept of autonomy and the changing character of war
; 2/2018
Some reflections on autonomous weapon systems
; 2/2018
So man created robot in his own image
; 2/2018
From Aristotle’s ʻArithmetic Proportion’ to Ménage-à-trois – Anglo-American Justice Theories in the Context of Norwegian Tort Law
; 2/2019
Grave Breaches and Justifications: The War Crime of Forcible Transfer or Deportation of Civilians and the Exception for Evacuations for Imperative Military Reasons
; 2/2019
Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests
; 2/2019
Norwegian Cartels
; 2/2020
Governing Religion and Gender in Anti-Discrimination Laws in Norway and Denmark
; 2/2020
High-Frequency Trading as an Impediment to Long-Term and Sustainable Finance
; 2/2020
COVID-19 Tracing Apps as a Legal Problem: An Investigation of the Norwegian ‘Smittestopp’ App
; 2/2021
Oslo law review 2/2021
; 2/2021
Hate Speech and Racialised Discrimination of the Norwegian Sámi: Legal Responses and Responsibility
; 2/2021
Conceptualising Judicial Independence and Accountability from a Regulatory Perspective
; 2/2022
Oslo law review 2/2022
; 2/2022
The Legitimacy of the European Systemic Risk Board in Respect of its Performance, Roles and Contributions to the Financial Regulatory System
; 2/2022
Beyond the Principle of Proportionality: Controlling the Restriction of Rights under Factual Uncertainty
; 2/2022
To What Extent Must, and Can, the Boards of Norwegian Limited Liability Companies and Public Limited Liability Companies Consider Sustainability?
; 2/2023
From Soft to Hard Law and Interpretation: the Case of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the Role of the National Contact Points
; 2/2023
A Comparison of the French and German Transparency Laws
; 2/2023
The Role of Soft Law in the Application of the Law: The Norwegian Perspective
; 2/2023
Oslo law review 2/2023
; 2/2023
Introduction
; 2/2023
Corporate Social Responsibility and the Norwegian Transparency Act: the Importance of Choice of Law
; 2/2023
The Norwegian Legislation on Social Sustainability: An Overview of the Transparency Act
; 2/2023
Liability for Shareholders and Directors of Limited Liability Companies, for CSR-Related Breaches
; 2/2023
Legal pluralism and human rights in the idea of climate justice
; 3/2015
Disasters and refugee protection
; 3/2015
The legal treatment of muslim minority women under the rule of islamic law in Greek thrace
; 3/2015
Legal and moral pluralism
; 3/2015
Special issue on human rights and legal pluralism
; 3/2015
Vulnerability under article 14 of the European convention on human rights
; 3/2017
Responding to disadvantage and inequality through law
; 3/2017
Caught in a balancing act
; 3/2017
Vulnerability and inevitable inequality
; 3/2017
Non-refoulement in Strasbourg: making sense of the assessment of individual circumstances
; 3/2018
Unilateral acts in the age of social media
; 3/2018
Donald Trump’s Golf Resort in Aberdeenshire, Scotland: The ‘Greatest’ incomplete planning disaster in the world?
; 3/2018
Dual Attribution of Conduct to both an International Organisation and a Member State
; 3/2019
Oslo law review 3/2019
; 3/2019
Norway’s Constitution in a Comparative Perspective
; 3/2019
Same, Same but Different: Proportionality Assessments and Equality Norms
; 3/2020
Judging Climate Change: The Role of the Judiciary in the Fight Against Climate Change
; 3/2020
The Internal, Systemic and Constitutional Integrity of EU Regulation 883/2004 on the Coordination of Social Security Systems: Lessons from a Scandal
; 3/2020
Oslo law review 3/2021
; 3/2021
Online Platform Work and Work Environment Law: A Scandinavian Legal Perspective
; 3/2021
Security by Design: Aspirations and Realities in a Regulatory Context
; 3/2021
Oslo law review 3/2022
; 3/2022
Religious Communities and Their Employees
; 3/2022
Impact of the ELI/UNIDROIT European Model Rules for Civil Procedure on National Law – the Case of Norway
; 3/2022
Oslo law review 3/2023
; 3/2023
A Sky Full of Stars, Constellations, Satellites and More!Legal Issues for a ‘Darkʼ Sky
; 3/2023
Loading…
Vedlegg:
- Juridika
- Idunn